MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive316% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory47.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime15 Days
Run DateMay 07 '21 at 08:51
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 66.5
1-Core 151
2-Core 287
89% 168 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 861
83% 683 Pts
64-Core 1252
78% 1252 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.7% Very good
Lighting 96.4
Reflection 103
Parallax 94.8
79% 98.1 fps
MRender 93.5
Gravity 100
Splatting 95.9
79% 96.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
573GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1365 1410 1458 1459 1477 1450 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2,429
Write 1,711
Mixed 1,628
SusWrite 1,436
403% 1,801 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 79
259% 90.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,221
DQ Write 1,054
DQ Mixed 1,131
849% 1,135 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 316%
Great: 435%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
232GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1240 377 309 310 310 312 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 1,943
Write 1,262
Mixed 607
SusWrite 476
237% 1,072 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 55.2
199% 73.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,094
DQ Write 1,146
DQ Mixed 724
653% 988 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 218%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$51
2TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 202 200 205 203 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 156
Mixed 88
SusWrite 201
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 112%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
493GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 110 112 113 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 191
Write 154
Mixed 82.9
SusWrite 111
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$123
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 100 101 108 99 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 126
Write 104
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 104
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.7
218% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M2E3200C16 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 23
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 22.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,476 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) - $225

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,483
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback