Gigabyte GA-M61PME-S2P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-M61PME-S2P  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '21 at 17:55
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Athlon 5000 Dual-Core
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Memory 53.5
1-Core 39.9
2-Core 77.8
36% 57.1 Pts
4-Core 78.3
8-Core 77.7
11% 78 Pts
64-Core 78.6
5% 78.6 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 47%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$30
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 60 54 35 63 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 10.2
Write 16.7
Mixed 14.4
SusWrite 54.6
18% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
41% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 56%
Maxtor 6Y080L0 82GB-$33
41GB free
Firmware: YAR41BW0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 45 44 44 43 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 47.8
Write 47.2
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 44.7
32% 44 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
20.2% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 7.6
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.8
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-M61PME-S2P Builds (Compare 451 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-M61PME-S2P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $239Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $304Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback