Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 92.1 1-Core 71.8 2-Core 142 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 268 8-Core 359 40% 314 Pts	64-Core 359 22% 359 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8572) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.47 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.57% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 4.5 4% 4.43 fps	MRender 4.4 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5 4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.57% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$30 20,238 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 164GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFMP1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 73 87 125 75 71 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.1% Poor	Read 119 Write 89.4 Mixed 73 SusWrite 93.3 21% 93.6 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 16.7 4K Mixed 10.6 43% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 10.9 DQ Write 15.6 DQ Mixed 13 10% 13.2 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 91%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29 14,402 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 230GB free Firmware: VT100-59 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 70 69 69 69 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 66 Write 70.5 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 69.1 46% 63 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 6 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.4% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 4.4 15% 5.27 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 5.5 17% 6.03 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $390

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16