Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190515
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	May 24 '21 at 07:55
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 71.5 1-Core 112 2-Core 205 72% 129 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 471 56% 432 Pts	64-Core 513 32% 513 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% MSI(1462 C303) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.47 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.9% Poor	Lighting 7.1 Reflection 73.6 Parallax 86.2 6% 55.6 fps	MRender 84.3 Gravity 103 Splatting 93.3 77% 93.6 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500120G 120GB 4,749 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056RI SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 72 61 83 58 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 290 Write 270 Mixed 227 SusWrite 82.4 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 32 4K Mixed 20.7 65% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 147 126% 188 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 83%
Kingston SUV500120G 120GB 4,749 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 52GB free Firmware: 003056RI SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 86 65 76 74 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 314 Write 308 Mixed 242 SusWrite 85.1 53% 237 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 37.4 4K Mixed 20.6 73% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 269 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 135 129% 203 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 83%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2019)-$59 14,978 User benchmarks, average bench 201% 69GB free Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,271 Write 1,306 Mixed 1031 268% 1,202 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 97.1 4K Mixed 39.3 145% 54.9 MB/s	DQ Read 580 DQ Write 491 DQ Mixed 524 396% 532 MB/s
Poor: 143% Great: 238%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 78.CAGSS.ARC0B 029E CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 017A 78.CAGSS.ARC0B 029E CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 32GB 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	59% Above average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 26.2 MC Mixed 18.6 60% 21.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 24 SC Mixed 14.1 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 98 41% 98 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 67%

Battle cruiser

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	127x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	114x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	110x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	65x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	42x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	95x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	50x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	45x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $544

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16