PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7816 |
Motherboard | MSI Z87-G43 (MS-7816) (all builds) |
Memory | 26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150509 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 24 '21 at 17:37 |
Run Duration | 182 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
76.8%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3214) 3GB
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1959 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.10.01.07
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 260 258 258 255 251 MB/s
|
73.6%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$172
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 57 65 65 56 64 MB/s
|
22.1%
Poor
|
|||
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
217GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 27 23 22 31 34 MB/s
|
23.8%
Poor
|
|||
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$53
1TB free
Firmware: JKAOA20N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 62 65 63 60 63 MB/s
|
33.6%
Below average
|
|||
50%
Average
|
||||
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$96
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 136 136 137 134 135 MB/s
|
64%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
56.6%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4670KIntel $64Bench 68%, 128,482 samples | 396x |
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples | 204x |
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 142x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 92x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 91x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 90x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $560 |