Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9  (all builds)
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181106
Uptime5 Days
Run DateMay 25 '21 at 18:52
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7940X-$815
, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 75
1-Core 126
2-Core 254
82% 152 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 995
88% 748 Pts
64-Core 2,291
142% 2,291 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 179
Parallax 180
144% 178 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 159
Splatting 131
130% 163 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 424 426 426 424 425 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 449
Mixed 421
SusWrite 424
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 93.3
4K Mixed 49.7
171% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 176
144% 211 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54
693GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 402 404 404 402 403 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 416
Mixed 396
SusWrite 402
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 26.5
130% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 36.8
97% 203 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 91%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$176
4.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 181 187 187 187 186 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$176
5.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 182 185 185 185 185 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 90 92 96 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 73.8
Write 45.1
Mixed 53.1
SusWrite 93.8
49% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 87%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$73
361GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 65 66 65 66 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 78.7
Write 69.5
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 65.7
49% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 100%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 142 144 146 146 145 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 159
Write 137
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 144
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 87%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 83 83 85 83 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 104
Write 91.4
Mixed 66.9
SusWrite 84.4
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 88%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
2TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 111 111 112 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 134
Write 42.2
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 110
104% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
135% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 51%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
3TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 111 111 111 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 195
Write 194
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 110
170% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
96% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.8% Above average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 14.8
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 10.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,544
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback