Asus H110M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-C (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171212
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 26 '21 at 15:20
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Memory 86.5 1-Core 109 2-Core 214 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 400 8-Core 423 54% 411 Pts	64-Core 389 24% 389 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 36D1) CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.47 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Lighting 22.5 Reflection 18.5 Parallax 21.2 18% 20.7 fps	MRender 25.1 Gravity 23.6 Splatting 17 17% 21.9 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: 583ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 78 67 90 92 81 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 272 Write 125 Mixed 162 SusWrite 83.4 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 38.6 126% 52.1 MB/s	DQ Read 91.6 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 95.4 75% 103 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 73%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB 23,667 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 459GB free Firmware: CA14 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 108 108 110 110 109 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 105 Write 104 Mixed 57.5 SusWrite 108 69% 93.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 61%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 100GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 114 115 115 115 115 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 108 Write 110 Mixed 74 SusWrite 114 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.C16FAD 1x16GB 1,141 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 12.3 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 12.7 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 70.9 56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-C Builds (Compare 1,039 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-C

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	176x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	146x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	116x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	98x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	89x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	68x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	41x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	26x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	18x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	18x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $166

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16