PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C13 |
Motherboard | MSI H310M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7C13) (all builds) |
Memory | 2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190905 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 10 '21 at 15:46 |
Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 50% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
53.4%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280-$185
CLim: 940 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
669GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 155 144 153 148 MB/s
|
83.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 5.6 6 5.5 6 6 MB/s
|
5.75%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Transcend JM2666HLB-8G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $108Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 522x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $107Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 311x |
Core i7-9700Intel $260Bench 92%, 79,875 samples | 123x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 120x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 115x |
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 96x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 113% - Outstanding | Total price: $167 |