EVGA 152-HR-E979

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	82% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	EVGA 152-HR-E979 (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20141009
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '21 at 15:53
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Memory 91.8 1-Core 118 2-Core 231 83% 147 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 601 60% 489 Pts	64-Core 597 37% 597 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 116 Parallax 103 84% 107 fps	MRender 100 Gravity 101 Splatting 89.2 78% 96.7 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 344GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 258 37 33 34 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	Read 465 Write 432 Mixed 367 SusWrite 123 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 88.1 4K Mixed 43.8 154% 55.1 MB/s	DQ Read 328 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 237 205% 301 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 126%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60 7,986 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 752GB free Firmware: MJAOA5E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 157 156 160 161 157 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 154 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 156 88% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 92%
Adata S102 Pro USB 3.0 16GB-$22 1,656 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 8GB free, PID 312b Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 8 7.1 7.6 7.1 7.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	8.12% Terrible	Read 28.9 Write 7.3 Mixed 7.3 SusWrite 7.5 14% 12.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.1 32% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.12% Great: 27%
Patriot Memory 16GB 360 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 7GB free, PID 3100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	9.28% Terrible	Read 29.7 Write 15.7 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 17.2 24% 19.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 23% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.28% Great: 11%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 1,841 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2TB free, PID ab38 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Read 25.9 Write 22 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 20.8 31% 23 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.5 133% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 2x8GB 6,401 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.3% Above average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 15.6 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 18.2 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 152-HR-E979 Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: EVGA 152-HR-E979

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	63x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	5x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	23x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	7x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	6x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $100Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	15x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $46Bench 234%, 87,206 samples	7x
CS90 0 500GB SSDPNYBench 63%, 102 samples	4x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 51%, 9,944 samples	13x
RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 27%, 2,515 samples	8x
Sniper DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 59%, 546 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $448

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16