Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics59.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '21 at 20:55
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$600
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 164
2-Core 321
107% 193 Pts
4-Core 631
8-Core 1,217
114% 924 Pts
64-Core 2,440
164% 2,440 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$290
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Lighting 74.3
Reflection 76.5
Parallax 69.2
60% 73.3 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 72.7
Splatting 67.7
58% 69.1 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$120
233GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 439 444 444 431 433 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 437
Mixed 379
SusWrite 438
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 49.2
161% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 105%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$75
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2,705
Write 2,553
Mixed 1,914
532% 2,390 MB/s
4K Read 74.9
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 103
346% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,372
DQ Write 1,021
DQ Mixed 1149
872% 1,181 MB/s
Poor: 205% Great: 333%
Transcend SSD220 240GB-$50
160GB free
Firmware: P0330AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 54 53 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 484
Write 414
Mixed 383
SusWrite 90.4
76% 343 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 39.7
131% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 186
141% 191 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
505GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 104 108 109 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 114
Write 74.3
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 106
67% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 133 132 137 138 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 136
Write 131
Mixed 93.2
SusWrite 134
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 60.3
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 41.2
135% 47.1 GB/s
SC Read 31.1
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 40.6
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 61.1
66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 126%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 34,422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,008
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback