Asus H110M-CS

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-CS (all builds)
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161227
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '21 at 07:55
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	65%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$110 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 73.1 1-Core 95.5 2-Core 170 65% 113 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 380 43% 338 Pts	64-Core 358 22% 358 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 8C97) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.63 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.8% Poor	Lighting 31.7 Reflection 32.3 Parallax 33.9 26% 32.6 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 35.1 Splatting 24.2 26% 32.4 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 85 78 70 74 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Read 445 Write 191 Mixed 389 SusWrite 126 64% 288 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 77.7 4K Mixed 47.3 159% 54.2 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 354 265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 100 99 97 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 83.2 Write 75.5 Mixed 52.7 SusWrite 98.5 57% 77.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.C16FBR 1x16GB 308 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.4% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 12 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 11.3 SC Mixed 10.4 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 94.5 42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-CS Builds (Compare 895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	245x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	145x
Core i3-6098PIntelBench 62%, 6,133 samples	90x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	127x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	116x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	106x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	57x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $36Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	39x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	33x

RAM
1x4GBAdataBench 31%, 5,816 samples	34x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16