Asrock Z370 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191031
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 20 '21 at 03:55
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 248
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 582
66% 515 Pts
64-Core 966
60% 966 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
EVGA(3842 2384) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
145% Outstanding
Lighting 194
Reflection 170
Parallax 207
158% 190 fps
MRender 231
Gravity 179
Splatting 158
151% 189 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 145%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,962
Write 730
Mixed 1,224
286% 1,305 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 60.7
196% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 923
DQ Write 595
DQ Mixed 647
512% 722 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
190GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1447 1282 1273 1338 1123 961 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 1597
Write 1,446
Mixed 1,436
SusWrite 1,238
322% 1,429 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 68.2
219% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,098
DQ Write 679
DQ Mixed 900
668% 892 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 247%
Great: 410%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
991GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 123 127 127 127 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 148
Write 107
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 126
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 96%
Toshiba HDWQ140 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 44 45 45 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 180
Write 41.9
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 44.3
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
188% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 112%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 160 166 165 164 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 149
Write 128
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 164
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.6% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 22
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 21.4
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 58: 5R 8G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
58% 19% 113 64 5 240 24.5" 1280 720 BNQ7F58 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical Z370 Taichi Builds (Compare 973 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Taichi - $330

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,139
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback