Asus H97M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H97M-E  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160328
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 20 '21 at 19:35
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5850HQ
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 97
1-Core 137
2-Core 267
94% 167 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 703
68% 560 Pts
64-Core 713
44% 713 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 22.8
Parallax 17.7
16% 20.3 fps
MRender 24.5
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 17.4
17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$37
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 665 714 713 719 720 723 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 709
Write 705
Mixed 648
SusWrite 709
156% 693 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 65.1
225% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 773
DQ Write 732
DQ Mixed 884
628% 796 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 175%
Great: 297%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 92 91 94 91 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 144
Write 130
Mixed 59.9
SusWrite 90.4
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 1
318% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 0420 DDR3 1600 0420 DDR3 1600 16GB
2200, 2200, 2200, 2200 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
93.9% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 32.1
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 24.3
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 50.5
79% 50.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 2R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 10% 61 71 59 30 84.6" 2048 1152 SAM0FF0 SAMSUNG
History: Score 19: 3R 0G 4B | Score 18: 2R 2G 2B
Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 2,533 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $277
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback