HP EJ239AA-B14 w5270.be

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EJ239AA-B14 w5270.be (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTek LITHIUM
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20051028
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '21 at 16:22
Run Duration	358 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium D 2.80GHz 3,782 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Memory 65.2 1-Core 21.4 2-Core 44.3 32% 43.6 Pts	4-Core 44.9 8-Core 44.9 6% 44.9 Pts	64-Core 44.1 3% 44.1 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 331 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B 9820) 256MB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	0.54% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.6 Parallax 1.1 0% 0.73 fps	MRender 1.3 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 0.7 1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.54% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD340 128GB-$88 2,082 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVN059 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 121 140 79 106 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.6% Average	Read 188 Write 136 Mixed 134 SusWrite 115 32% 143 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 39 4K Mixed 24.1 78% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 29.8 DQ Write 82.2 DQ Mixed 38.2 34% 50.1 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 84%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB 204 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 1320 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.2 4.4 3.7 4 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	4.71% Terrible	Read 16.9 Write 2.9 Mixed 2.7 SusWrite 4.1 7% 6.65 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.71% Great: 7%
Seagate M3 2TB 192 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1.5TB free, PID 61b5 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 13 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 23.6 Write 24.9 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 14.6 28% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.2 54% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 53%
ST316002 3A 160GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 76GB free, PID 070c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 12 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	7.94% Terrible	Read 25.8 Write 9.2 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 14.5 19% 15.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.94% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.2 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 4.2 11% 3.97 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP EJ239AA-B14 w5270.be

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)