Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	88GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 88GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2618-C1
Memory	60.3 GB free of 88 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111219
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '21 at 18:28
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5680 4,201 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	59.2% Above average	Memory 83.1 1-Core 84.6 2-Core 106 59% 91.1 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 198 28% 204 Pts	64-Core 171 11% 171 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 5000 751 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Nvidia(10DE 0770) 2.5GB CLim: 513 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 2.5GB, Driver: 353.30 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Lighting 12.1 Reflection 21.4 Parallax 15.4 10% 16.3 fps	MRender 22.3 Gravity 10.1 Splatting 15.2 13% 15.9 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 512GB-$209 3,350 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 390GB free (System drive) Firmware: N1114H SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 120 120 115 119 122 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.4% Below average	Read 130 Write 126 Mixed 114 SusWrite 117 27% 122 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 37.6 4K Mixed 21.2 69% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 93.4 72% 99.1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 111%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35 32,229 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 447GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 91 91 89 90 90 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 86.5 Write 84.7 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 89.7 57% 78.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 11x8GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 11 of 12 slots used 88GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	26.3% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 10.9 24% 8.37 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 7.1 21% 7.2 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	60	23.8"	1280 720	LEN61CA LEN S24e-10

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS R670-2 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	14x
Xeon E5540IntelBench 63%, 486 samples	9x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56801stBench 71%, 2,389 samples	5x

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	9x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	9x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	6x

SSD
Mercury Elec 240GBOWCBench 36%, 15 samples	8x
Logical Volume 478GBLsilogicBench 45%, 9 samples	7x
JAJS600M256C 256GBBench 69%, 1,795 samples	4x

RAM
6x8GBUnknownBench 53%, 2,890 samples	11x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	8x
12x8GBUnknownBench 53%, 575 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16