MSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B58
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58)  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 24 '21 at 03:28
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$320
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 95.4
1-Core 134
2-Core 265
94% 165 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 799
83% 651 Pts
64-Core 990
66% 990 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$1,089
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 182
Parallax 169
130% 170 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 174
Splatting 122
135% 142 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 149%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
270GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 787 535 533 536 534 527 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,725
Write 1,726
Mixed 686
SusWrite 575
262% 1,178 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 58.4
212% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,133
DQ Write 685
DQ Mixed 733
593% 850 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 210%
Great: 253%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$209
279GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 432 431 429 430 428 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 408
Mixed 319
SusWrite 430
93% 416 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 32.6
141% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 100
101% 167 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 117%
Intel 510 Series 120GB
41GB free
Firmware: PPG4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 199 200 181 196 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60% Above average
Read 401
Write 199
Mixed 227
SusWrite 195
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 25.6
94% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 82.9
DQ Write 62
DQ Mixed 60.3
48% 68.4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60%
Great: 60%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
340GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 488 488 460 461 461 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 486
Mixed 465
SusWrite 474
109% 484 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 58.7
192% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 358
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 126%
Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$81
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 102
Write 95.8
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 102
66% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$68
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 25.8
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 39.3
SC Mixed 29.5
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 56
71% 56 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 240 24.5" 1280 720 AUS25B1 ROG PG258Q
Typical Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58) Builds (Compare 3,340 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $1,757
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback