Asrock H67M

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H67M (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120427
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 27 '21 at 07:41
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400S-$70 10,987 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Memory 65.3 1-Core 71.1 2-Core 139 54% 91.9 Pts	4-Core 267 8-Core 268 36% 267 Pts	64-Core 253 16% 253 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.36% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 6.5 Parallax 1.4 3% 3.93 fps	MRender 6.1 Gravity 4.6 Splatting 3.4 4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.36% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
EYOTA-256GB 256GB 235 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0421B SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 206 222 218 216 226 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.8% Below average	Read 225 Write 210 Mixed 134 SusWrite 216 44% 196 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 29.2 4K Mixed 4 31% 13.4 MB/s	DQ Read 24.1 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 9 22% 44.6 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 854GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 164 156 162 149 160 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Read 140 Write 65 Mixed 72.1 SusWrite 158 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773SB0-CK0 Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 10GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.2% Average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 12.9 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 9.2 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	15.5"	1280 720	BNQ7895 BenQ G615HDPL

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H67M Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H67M - $104

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	26x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	19x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	15x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	19x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	10x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	10x

SSD
128GB SSD 128GBLexarBench 67%, 8,135 samples	6x
Sata III 256GBIntensoBench 67%, 2,573 samples	5x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	5x

RAM
HX316C10F/8 KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GBKingstonBench 52%, 106 samples	8x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 5,657 samples	6x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $350

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16