| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20210615 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 28 '21 at 22:39 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
81.9%
Excellent
|
78% 141 Pts
|
77% 629 Pts
|
59% 958 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
|
30.7%
Below average
|
32% 40.5 fps
|
29% 35.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$89
894GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 439 442 443 443 443 MB/s
|
108%
Outstanding
|
102% 455 MB/s
|
166% 55.1 MB/s
|
150% 201 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Cruzer 32GB
14GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 7.4 8.4 7.6 6.9 MB/s
|
5.92%
Terrible
|
15% 12.6 MB/s
|
88% 1.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$63
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
81.7%
Excellent
|
84% 29.5 GB/s
|
72% 25.2 GB/s
|
44% 91.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 7 | 60 | 21.5" | 1280 720 | SAM04DD SyncMaster |
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,719 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples | 1,332x |
| Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples | 1,054x |
| Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $149Bench 96%, 383,420 samples | 879x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 510x |
| RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 398x |
| RTX 3070-TiNvidia $600Bench 158%, 218,061 samples | 361x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $1,208 |