Gigabyte GA-B550 VISION D-P

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	69.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B550 VISION D-P (all builds)
Memory	24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201013
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 29 '21 at 01:12
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$149 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Memory 73.8 1-Core 157 2-Core 295 94% 175 Pts	4-Core 525 8-Core 894 86% 710 Pts	64-Core 1,124 70% 1,124 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Asus(1043 87E0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.9% Good	Lighting 91.9 Reflection 79.9 Parallax 76.3 75% 82.7 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 61 Splatting 52.6 60% 77.2 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,515 Write 2,055 Mixed 1,667 462% 2,079 MB/s	4K Read 57.8 4K Write 162 4K Mixed 76.6 271% 98.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,212 DQ Write 1,029 DQ Mixed 1,040 801% 1,094 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 290GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1754 937 605 607 607 607 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	289% Outstanding	Read 2,380 Write 1,710 Mixed 1,473 SusWrite 853 357% 1,604 MB/s	4K Read 59.6 4K Write 148 4K Mixed 83.8 276% 97 MB/s	DQ Read 1,336 DQ Write 1,196 DQ Mixed 1,248 941% 1,260 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 289% Great: 340%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 4x8GB 3,294 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	65.6% Good	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 25.4 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 22.9 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 26.3 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 92.9 43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 43: 6R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
43%	23%	57	319	249	144	34.1"	3440 1440	GSM774B LG ULTRAGEAR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B550 VISION D-P Builds (Compare 911 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 183%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 VISION D-P

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	270x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	237x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $149Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	138x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	117x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $600Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	106x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	91x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	88x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	86x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	43x

RAM
CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 94%, 38,830 samples	37x
CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GBCorsairBench 85%, 54,117 samples	34x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,257

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16