Razer Tomahawk Gaming Desktop

Performance Results


Gaming 120% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 120% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Razer Tomahawk Gaming Desktop (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel NUC9i9QNB
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '21 at 03:14
Run Duration	246 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9980HK 8,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	Memory 85.9 1-Core 155 2-Core 300 98% 180 Pts	4-Core 540 8-Core 1,035 94% 787 Pts	64-Core 1,331 82% 1,331 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$396 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 12A6) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	128% Outstanding	Lighting 172 Reflection 171 Parallax 171 140% 171 fps	MRender 187 Gravity 152 Splatting 126 124% 155 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme CA5-8D512 512GB 2,452 User benchmarks, average bench 171% 423GB free (System drive) Firmware: CQ20904 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1476 620 616 625 630 628 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	214% Outstanding	Read 1,285 Write 1,817 Mixed 839 SusWrite 766 265% 1,177 MB/s	4K Read 49.2 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 65.4 215% 74.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,221 DQ Write 970 DQ Mixed 1,014 781% 1,068 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 214% Great: 234%
Sandisk S3 1T02 1TB 12,047 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 526GB free Firmware: 40101000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 430 433 433 434 439 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	98% Outstanding	Read 402 Write 394 Mixed 293 SusWrite 430 86% 380 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 67.8 4K Mixed 38.4 135% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 269 DQ Mixed 239 199% 288 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 122%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMSO480E84-2666E 2x8GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	82% Excellent	MC Read 32.2 MC Write 31.5 MC Mixed 22.8 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 36.8 SC Mixed 26.7 77% 26.9 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 60: 7R 5G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
60%	69%	32	295	192	60	24"	1920 1080	ACI24A5 VG248

History: Score 27: 1R 4G 10B | Score 56: 7R 5G 6B | Score 60: 7R 5G 10B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Tomahawk Gaming Desktop Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 151%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 142%

UFO

System: Razer Tomahawk Gaming Desktop

CPU
Core i9-9980HKIntelBench 82%, 8,965 samples	62x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	30x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	6x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	6x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	18x
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	13x
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TBBench 430%, 44,185 samples	4x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	20x
NMSO480E84-2666E 2x8GBUnknownBench 75%, 31 samples	18x
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 81%, 6,948 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $910

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16