Biostar A880G+

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Biostar A880G+ (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110125
Uptime	4.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '21 at 23:45
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 B55 3,005 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	42% Average	Memory 52.5 1-Core 46.9 2-Core 93.1 39% 64.2 Pts	4-Core 182 8-Core 185 24% 183 Pts	64-Core 185 12% 185 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203 42,130 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 2554) 2GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Lighting 34.9 Reflection 37.6 Parallax 46.3 28% 39.6 fps	MRender 32.1 Gravity 34.6 Splatting 26.9 25% 31.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SE50S3240G 240GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: 611ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 89 89 69 65 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.2% Below average	Read 173 Write 166 Mixed 173 SusWrite 78.9 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 36.1 4K Mixed 18.2 64% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 27.2 DQ Write 49.6 DQ Mixed 31.5 26% 36.1 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 92%
Kingston SE50S3240G 240GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 213GB free Firmware: 611ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 89 91 90 91 93 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36% Below average	Read 171 Write 174 Mixed 172 SusWrite 89.8 34% 152 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 38.3 4K Mixed 20.6 70% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 27.9 DQ Write 57 DQ Mixed 34.2 28% 39.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 3TB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 85 88 87 88 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 96.8 Write 99.8 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 85.3 62% 83.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 1 255% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 113%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 85 88 87 88 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	57.9% Above average	Read 116 Write 82.1 Mixed 54.8 SusWrite 85.4 62% 84.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 67%
Walgreen Infinitive 32GB 369 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 20GB free, PID 5595 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 7.6 7.4 6.3 6.6 6.5 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 23.7 Write 9.7 Mixed 10.4 SusWrite 6.8 15% 12.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 2.3 148% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 8GB 364 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	MC Read 13 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 11.1 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 8.7 21% 7.33 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 18: 2R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
18%	7%	85	50	6	60	35"	3440 1440	SPT0DB7 Sceptre C35

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A880G+ Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A880G+

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	3x
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	3x
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 5,806 samples	6x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	3x

SSD
CS900 250GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 2,686 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x
NEO N400 SSD 120GBKlevvBench 65%, 486 samples	2x

RAM
9905403-433.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 44%, 97 samples	4x
T4G86U1-P9H T4G86U1-P9H 8GBUnknownBench 25%, 3 samples	2x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $83

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16