Medion Akoya E6424 MD99850

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Medion Akoya E6424 MD99850 (all builds)
Motherboard	Medion D15SIN
Memory	3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160203
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '21 at 01:18
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6267U 1,134 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 77.6 1-Core 61.6 2-Core 120 53% 86.4 Pts	4-Core 208 8-Core 214 28% 211 Pts	64-Core 203 12% 203 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Graphics 550 819 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Device(1B0A 226E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	4.89% Terrible	Lighting 9.1 Reflection 9.5 Parallax 0.3 7% 6.3 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.89% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD PHISON 128GB PS3109-S9 534 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM02.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 29 27 23 27 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	29% Poor	Read 402 Write 67.1 Mixed 118 SusWrite 31.2 33% 154 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 57.4 4K Mixed 0.1 31% 19.2 MB/s	DQ Read 62.6 DQ Write 60 DQ Mixed 8.2 21% 43.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 64%
Crucial_CT256MX100SSD1 1TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 100GB free Firmware: AX1P1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 96 98 94 93 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 97.1 Write 96.1 Mixed 32.2 SusWrite 95.9 18% 80.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 2% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 17%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23 12,481 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 7GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 19 19 16 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 35.2 Write 21.4 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 19.5 32% 25.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 57% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT425S6CFR6A-PB HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 6GB 1,383 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	76% Very good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 43.6 MC Mixed 17.1 84% 29.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 13.9 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 85.2 47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	3	1	60	15.5"	1280 720	AUO30ED

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Akoya E6424 MD99850 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Medion Akoya E6424 MD99850

CPU
Core i5-6267UIntelBench 57%, 1,134 samples	29x

GPU
Iris 550 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 9%, 792 samples	15x
Iris Graphics 550IntelBench 8%, 819 samples	14x

SSD
PHISON 128GB PS3109-S9SSDBench 44%, 534 samples	24x
MX500 4TBCrucial $254Bench 100%, 1,824 samples	2x
MX300 SATA M.2 525GBCrucial $140Bench 85%, 20,154 samples	1x

RAM
HMT425S6CFR6A-PB HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 6GBHynixBench 34%, 1,383 samples	14x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GBSamsungBench 48%, 2,847 samples	3x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 55%, 10,168 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16