| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 40.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Default string (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Colorful C.B150M-D |
| Memory | 0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160601 |
| Uptime | 3.3 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 06 '21 at 04:52 |
| Run Duration | 168 Seconds |
| Run User | ARE-User |
| Background CPU | 41% |
PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.9%
Good
|
77% 136 Pts
|
52% 438 Pts
|
30% 476 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40.4%
Average
|
44% 60.1 fps
|
34% 45.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend TS120GSSD220S 120GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFR21.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 110 8.3 46 72 11 MB/s
|
34.8%
Below average
|
28% 128 MB/s
|
51% 18.9 MB/s
|
70% 136 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 161 154 148 154 156 MB/s
|
85%
Excellent
|
94% 130 MB/s
|
130% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
29.9%
Poor
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
17% 5.87 GB/s
|
54% 74.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,495 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Default string
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples | 1,018x |
| Xeon E5-2640 v3IntelBench 71%, 3,267 samples | 956x |
| Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples | 906x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 485x |
| UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples | 478x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 458x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |