ASUS H87M-PLUS/CSM

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	ASUS H87M-PLUS/CSM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK H87M-PLUS
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131202
Uptime	14.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '21 at 00:09
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$62 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 76.2 1-Core 96.6 2-Core 176 67% 116 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 381 45% 348 Pts	64-Core 384 24% 384 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Asus(1043 8465) 2GB CLim: 1291 MHz, MLim: 1777 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	34.4% Below average	Lighting 40.5 Reflection 34.8 Parallax 52 33% 42.4 fps	MRender 52 Gravity 47 Splatting 39.9 37% 46.3 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU635 240GB-$20 12,702 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 163GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X04c12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 333 327 323 329 325 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	77.2% Very good	Read 332 Write 310 Mixed 280 SusWrite 312 70% 309 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 80.1 4K Mixed 34 115% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 191 148% 200 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 97%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 682GB free Firmware: AX003J SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 106 106 106 106 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 93.4 Write 92.5 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 105 59% 81.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 4x4GB 2,168 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 22.5 MC Mixed 17.7 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 18.9 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 88 46% 88 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	10	8	30	72.3"	1280 701	GSM0001 LG TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-PLUS/CSM Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 66%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 51%

Yacht

System: ASUS H87M-PLUS/CSM

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $62Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	1x

SSD
SU635 240GBAdata $20Bench 68%, 12,702 samples	1x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 4x4GBCorsairBench 65%, 2,168 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $482

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16