Asrock Z270M Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics160% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock Z270M Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170519
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateJul 08 '21 at 22:04
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$379
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 84
1-Core 124
2-Core 231
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 629
67% 522 Pts
64-Core 617
41% 617 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$1,376
EVGA(3842 2383) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
160% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 190
Parallax 224
148% 199 fps
MRender 252
Gravity 210
Splatting 153
175% 205 fps
Poor: 125%
This bench: 160%
Great: 197%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
635GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 50 50 50 51 51 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 199% Great: 357%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
338GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 92 93 93 91 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 168
Write 141
Mixed 91
SusWrite 90.4
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
858GB free
Firmware: SBK2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 96 97 99 99 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 51.3
Write 84.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 99.8
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
169% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
67.2% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 20.4
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 22.1
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 76: 10R 7G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
76% 55% 40 317 241 144 31.5" 2560 1440 SAM0E14 C32HG7x
History: Score 46: 5R 4G 9B | Score 57: 7R 5G 7B | Score 76: 10R 7G 5B
Typical Z270M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock Z270M Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,025
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback