Samsung 800G5M/800G5W

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	24.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Samsung 800G5M/800G5W (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP800G5M-XT1BR
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181113
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '21 at 18:49
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 80 2-Core 164 64% 109 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 338 42% 317 Pts	64-Core 344 21% 344 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Sanyo(144D C790) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7111 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	Lighting 31 Reflection 31.1 Parallax 32.2 25% 31.4 fps	MRender 34.9 Gravity 34.3 Splatting 20.9 24% 30 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53 30,265 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK11.T Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 217 215 261 228 205 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	Read 571 Write 503 Mixed 573 SusWrite 252 107% 475 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 53.1 4K Mixed 30.5 101% 35.3 MB/s	DQ Read 556 DQ Write 451 DQ Mixed 432 343% 480 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 141%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 840GB free Firmware: JU000F SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 130 130 131 131 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Read 138 Write 135 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 130 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 0.6 231% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB 5,327 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	62.9% Good	MC Read 22.8 MC Write 24.6 MC Mixed 20.2 64% 22.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 21.4 SC Mixed 17.1 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	60	15.5"	1920 1080	NCP000D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 800G5M/800G5W Builds (Compare 345 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 800G5M/800G5W

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	173x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	172x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	252x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	93x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	17x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	12x
MZVLW128HEGR-000 128GBSamsungBench 166%, 199 samples	10x

RAM
SF464128CKHIWDFSEG 2x4GBSmartBench 67%, 688 samples	107x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 36,396 samples	45x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16