Casper Desktop System

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	20.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Casper Desktop System (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON IPMTB-GS
Memory	29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100806
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 14 '21 at 15:58
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 94 1-Core 85.9 2-Core 174 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 530 54% 439 Pts	64-Core 641 40% 641 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120 38,521 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(174B E258) CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.1 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	20.4% Poor	Lighting 25.5 Reflection 26.4 Parallax 34.7 21% 28.9 fps	MRender 23.8 Gravity 24.7 Splatting 24 20% 24.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 145 84 96 90 86 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43% Average	Read 194 Write 223 Mixed 216 SusWrite 112 42% 186 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 54.6 4K Mixed 16.4 74% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 27.8 53% 104 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 86%
WD Green 500GB (2012) 31,295 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 466GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 144 145 145 144 144 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Read 143 Write 138 Mixed 87.5 SusWrite 144 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 79%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 190GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 117 116 115 116 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Read 140 Write 140 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 116 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 32GB 5,781 User benchmarks, average bench 53% null MHz 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.8% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 9.3 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 11.3 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 59.8 67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Desktop System Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Casper Desktop System

CPU
Core i7 X 980Intel $148Bench 76%, 8,133 samples	2x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	1x
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	1x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x
HD 6950AMD $290Bench 19%, 24,657 samples	1x

SSD
SATA SSD 240GBKioxia-exceriaBench 72%, 4,923 samples	1x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	2x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	1x
10GBUnknownBench 31%, 21,027 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Outstanding

Total price: $148

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16