Casper Desktop System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 12 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemCasper Desktop System  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON IPMTB-GS
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '21 at 11:18
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7 X 980-$1,100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 95.4
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 167
71% 115 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 489
53% 411 Pts
64-Core 618
41% 618 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1271 MHz, MLim: 1641 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Lighting 29.4
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 38.6
24% 32.9 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 30.2
Splatting 28.8
24% 28.9 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 22%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$37
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 84 91 90 103 149 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.1% Below average
Read 114
Write 57.8
Mixed 120
SusWrite 103
22% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 10.4
65% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 34.1
DQ Mixed 5.4
22% 52.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 87%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
466GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 143 143 143 142 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 139
Write 137
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 143
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 80%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
190GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 115 113 115 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 143
Write 128
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 114
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
49.4% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 18.4
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 11.7
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 55.8
72% 55.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Desktop System Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Casper Desktop System

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $1,257
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback