Asus PRIME Z390-A

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	279% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME Z390-A (all builds)
Memory	27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190318
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '21 at 17:36
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700-$260 79,875 User benchmarks, average bench 92% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	99.2% Outstanding	Memory 90.3 1-Core 147 2-Core 295 97% 178 Pts	4-Core 578 8-Core 1,166 103% 872 Pts	64-Core 1,094 68% 1,094 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 99.2% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 86B6) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	43.6% Average	Lighting 56.6 Reflection 57.8 Parallax 49.9 46% 54.8 fps	MRender 42.9 Gravity 51.2 Splatting 47 39% 47 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 363GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 960 876 859 858 863 873 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	279% Outstanding	Read 2,231 Write 2031 Mixed 1,389 SusWrite 881 365% 1,633 MB/s	4K Read 62.1 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 80.5 265% 90.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,397 DQ Write 1,018 DQ Mixed 1,068 836% 1,161 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 279% Great: 355%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 3.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 186 186 186 186 187 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 182 Mixed 71.8 SusWrite 185 112% 154 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 496% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 104%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 14GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 7.7 8.7 9.6 8.4 9.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	9.26% Terrible	Read 39.7 Write 18.9 Mixed 9.9 SusWrite 8.7 22% 19.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 25% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.26% Great: 23%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB 3,958 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 58GB free, PID 5590 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 9.1 9.1 8.9 9.3 9.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	9.71% Terrible	Read 32.4 Write 11 Mixed 17.1 SusWrite 9 20% 17.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.7 94% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.71% Great: 38%
USB3.2 FLASH DRIVE 249GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 232GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 16 17 16 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 36 Write 32.3 Mixed 33.4 SusWrite 17.1 39% 29.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.1 76% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 33%
SDHC Card 16GB 8,111 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 15GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	6.34% Terrible	Read 8.3 Write 13.6 Mixed 19.7 SusWrite 10.1 19% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1 70% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.34% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 54,651 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	81.7% Excellent	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 32.1 MC Mixed 26 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 32.1 SC Mixed 21 66% 23 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 15: 2R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
15%	5%	110	109	6	60	23.1"	1920 1080	GSM58D9 IPS234

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME Z390-A Builds (Compare 26,214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-A - $175

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $249Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	9,144x
Core i9-9900KIntel $409Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	6,183x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	4,119x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,957x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,879x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,599x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,555x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	1,321x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	1,120x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	1,267x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	928x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	928x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $982

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16