Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 17 '21 at 20:27
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 80%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 186
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 592
59% 467 Pts
64-Core 658
44% 658 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
Nvidia(10DE 1467) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 133
Parallax 154
122% 146 fps
MRender 156
Gravity 135
Splatting 100
111% 130 fps
Poor: 133%
This bench: 117%
Great: 226%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
238GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 316 324 313 319 326 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
70% Good
Read 378
Write 324
Mixed 304
SusWrite 315
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 25.3
90% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 155
122% 169 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70%
Great: 98%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$91
601GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 343 367 332 351 371 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 436
Write 372
Mixed 354
SusWrite 346
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 30.9
103% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 188
144% 197 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 125%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$180
627GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1681 1715 1694 1694 1729 1727 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 1,719
Write 1,719
Mixed 1,590
SusWrite 1,707
380% 1,684 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 51.7
168% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 702
DQ Write 622
DQ Mixed 676
503% 667 MB/s
Poor: 279%
This bench: 255%
Great: 459%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
670GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 153 153 152 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 147
Mixed 95.2
SusWrite 152
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$77
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 30.6
86% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 24.1
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 6 4 165 27" 1280 720 DEL41D9 DELL S2721DGF
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 73,214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,206
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback