Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics66.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201202
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 18 '21 at 04:25
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 68%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$270
AM4, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 57.7
1-Core 109
2-Core 200
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 494
53% 414 Pts
64-Core 495
33% 495 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$230
EVGA(3842 1163) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.3% Good
Lighting 89.7
Reflection 84.3
Parallax 74
72% 82.7 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 75.1
Splatting 68.2
59% 68.6 fps
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 73%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$55
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 406 402 281 300 278 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 294
Write 312
Mixed 306
SusWrite 318
70% 307 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 27.4
95% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 294
242% 347 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 125%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$155
355GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1628 1560 1164 921 895 907 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,151
Write 1,165
Mixed 931
SusWrite 1,179
250% 1,107 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 43.4
141% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 939
DQ Write 710
DQ Mixed 904
655% 851 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 199%
Great: 359%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 24
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 17.8
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 9 144 24.5" 1280 720 HPN357E HP 25x
Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 17,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $597
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback