PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock 880GM-LE FX (all builds) |
Memory | 3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130218 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 20 '21 at 03:54 |
Run Duration | 116 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 52% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
46.7%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 6950-$290
Sapphire(174B 186B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
|
18.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 29 18 38 32 30 MB/s
|
32.6%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5403-034.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 667 MHz
|
23.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X6 1045TAMD $165Bench 54%, 5,709 samples | 2x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 2x |
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 740NvidiaBench 7%, 30,433 samples | 2x |
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 1x |
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 40% - Below average | Total price: $285 |