HP Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F6
Memory2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161027
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJul 22 '21 at 23:35
Run Duration361 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 53.1
1-Core 42.8
2-Core 85.5
38% 60.5 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 152
21% 152 Pts
64-Core 151
10% 151 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 43%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 228 236 215 213 209 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 426
Write 222
Mixed 340
SusWrite 224
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 34.1
120% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 160
126% 174 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 Adata AO1L16BC2N1-BQHS 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
20.2% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 7
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 52: 8R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
52% 16% 86 37 21 60 0" 1366 768
History: Score 10: 1R 1G 2B | Score 31: 3R 3G 7B | Score 44: 6R 3G 5B | Score 53: 7R 4G 6B | Score 52: 8R 3G 3B
Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 17,965 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $29
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback