Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 24 '21 at 07:01
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$316
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 84.2
1-Core 133
2-Core 247
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 802
81% 642 Pts
64-Core 1,078
72% 1,078 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$280
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.7% Good
Lighting 88.1
Reflection 88.1
Parallax 79.8
71% 85.3 fps
MRender 89.4
Gravity 83.4
Splatting 72.5
68% 81.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 81%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.5 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 896
Write 1,186
Mixed 468
190% 850 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 42
173% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 428
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 315
243% 336 MB/s
Poor: 96% Great: 211%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$265
176GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 418 347 248 249 251 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 419
Write 434
Mixed 372
SusWrite 307
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 36.6
130% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$34
58GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 146 146 146 144 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 133
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 144
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2K3600C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 37.5
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 27.4
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 37.6
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 9 60 31.5" 1280 720 ACR0631 Acer ET322QK
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 24,942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,138
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback