Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200714
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jul 24 '21 at 16:42
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	64%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 88.3 1-Core 124 2-Core 248 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 489 49% 401 Pts	64-Core 507 31% 507 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Lighting 18.3 Reflection 18.5 Parallax 18.8 15% 18.5 fps	MRender 15.7 Gravity 18.3 Splatting 17.5 14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 451GB free Firmware: 401020WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 388 445 442 441 441 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 324 Write 467 Mixed 187 SusWrite 432 80% 352 MB/s	4K Read 39.8 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 52.7 184% 66.1 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 252 216% 319 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 111%
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 125 133 134 135 137 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	79.8% Very good	Read 297 Write 180 Mixed 316 SusWrite 146 53% 235 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 90.2 4K Mixed 40.5 152% 55.1 MB/s	DQ Read 256 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 182 163% 245 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	MC Read 26.4 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 24.2 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 27.6 SC Mixed 22.1 62% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 14: 2R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
14%	44%	9	70	5	72	23.5"	1920 1080	SAM0D2C C24F390

History: Score 18: 3R 0G 3B | Score 14: 2R 1G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	1,612x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,215x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	177x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	829x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	480x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	428x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	295x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $36Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	217x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples	142x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	360x
D12.2356WS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 81%, 464 samples	171x
D12.2324CS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 80%, 469 samples	162x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $438

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16