Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics174% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory19.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime10.2 Days
Run DateJul 25 '21 at 06:30
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 84
1-Core 138
2-Core 278
91% 167 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 843
81% 667 Pts
64-Core 1,338
83% 1,338 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
Asus(1043 87B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
174% Outstanding
Lighting 250
Reflection 224
Parallax 249
204% 241 fps
MRender 285
Gravity 206
Splatting 152
168% 214 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 174%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$38
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 853 852 153 28 54 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,300
Write 874
Mixed 827
SusWrite 332
185% 833 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 44.6
148% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 671
DQ Mixed 220
249% 412 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 141%
Great: 242%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
115GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 414 408 405 403 395 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 406
Write 410
Mixed 298
SusWrite 407
86% 380 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 29.9
103% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 159
122% 164 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST3360320AS 360GB-$79
197GB free
Firmware: 3.CHN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 58 58 58 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 61.7
Write 58.9
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 58
40% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 44%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
170GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 76 63 47 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 50.7
Write 108
Mixed 41
SusWrite 58.2
47% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
69% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
97% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 37.7
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 28.2
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 35.6
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 97%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 45: 5R 4G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
45% 42% 40 104 5 165 27" 1920 1080 AUS2720 VG278
History: Score 46: 8R 1G 3B | Score 45: 5R 4G 8B
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,796 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $929
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback