Gigabyte Z390 UD

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	6.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 UD (all builds)
Memory	27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210119
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '21 at 20:28
Run Duration	275 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Memory 95.7 1-Core 156 2-Core 312 103% 188 Pts	4-Core 625 8-Core 1243 110% 934 Pts	64-Core 1,237 76% 1,237 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 65,338 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	6.25% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 10.2 Parallax 8.9 5% 8.4 fps	MRender 12 Gravity 7.6 Splatting 12 9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.25% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74 114,373 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 416GB free (System drive) Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1630 925 973 960 822 902 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	283% Outstanding	Read 2020 Write 2,285 Mixed 1,796 SusWrite 1,035 401% 1,784 MB/s	4K Read 48.4 4K Write 162 4K Mixed 71.5 251% 93.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,523 DQ Write 1,261 DQ Mixed 1,386 1,040% 1,390 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 283% Great: 347%
Team T253X2001T 1TB 11,283 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 427GB free Firmware: V1.2.4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 467 471 471 466 471 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 470 Write 479 Mixed 455 SusWrite 473 106% 469 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 86.8 4K Mixed 44.1 160% 56.3 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 243 195% 272 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 105%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 496GB free Firmware: FP1R SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 122 118 123 122 119 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 132 Write 123 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 120 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 243% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 34GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 151 155 152 155 164 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Read 82.2 Write 115 Mixed 69.2 SusWrite 153 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.1 79% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 106%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB 40,802 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 163GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 119 118 117 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 85.5 Write 76 Mixed 63.5 SusWrite 116 63% 85.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.3 150% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 72%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 248GB 309 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 120GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 43 43 43 45 45 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Read 250 Write 137 Mixed 160 SusWrite 52.4 182% 150 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 6.4 420% 8.33 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 65%
USB DISK 3.0 127GB 171 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 115GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 95 99 94 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 128 Write 52 Mixed 22 SusWrite 95.5 89% 74.4 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 47% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 859B BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE 859B BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 859B BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE 32GB 140 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 38 MC Write 41.2 MC Mixed 31.4 105% 36.9 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 45.7 SC Mixed 31.5 94% 32.9 GB/s	Latency 54.8 73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	120	27"	1280 720	ACR064D Acer XF270H B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 UD Builds (Compare 11,778 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 99%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 74%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 UD - $180

CPU
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	2,778x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2,400x
Core i9-9900KIntel $412Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,465x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	990x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	809x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	597x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	365x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	316x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	312x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	483x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	478x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	224x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $795

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16