Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190111
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateJul 28 '21 at 07:38
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$113
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 59.2
1-Core 72.1
2-Core 146
54% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 206
30% 214 Pts
64-Core 216
14% 216 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.4% Poor
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 39.4
30% 38.9 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 27.6
27% 23.1 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 35%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$142
496GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 310 327 338 362 392 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 384
Write 362
Mixed 350
SusWrite 343
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 36.4
115% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 298
223% 298 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 138%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 51 54 44 50 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 27
Write 29.5
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 48.1
26% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.9% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 20.3
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 50: 10R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
50% 34% 29 153 19 60 40" 1920 1080 SAM0C39 SAMSUNG
History: Score 25: 3R 1G 7B | Score 50: 10R 0G 0B
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 40,187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $59

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback