Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110212
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 30 '21 at 20:08
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$194 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Memory 92.3 1-Core 97.5 2-Core 187 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 472 49% 396 Pts	64-Core 470 29% 470 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Asus(1043 04E3) CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.1 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Lighting 44.1 Reflection 47.1 Parallax 55.8 36% 49 fps	MRender 46.1 Gravity 43.3 Splatting 32.8 32% 40.7 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 73 63 56 56 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Read 476 Write 448 Mixed 369 SusWrite 88.7 77% 345 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 51.7 4K Mixed 39.1 127% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 227 209% 322 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 118%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60 30,974 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 258GB free Firmware: 1AA01108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 69 66 66 66 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	34.7% Below average	Read 52.2 Write 77 Mixed 50.5 SusWrite 68 46% 61.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-199.A00LF 9905403-199.A00LF Corsair CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 Corsair CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.5% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.4 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 16.2 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 63.4 63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 55: 6R 6G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
55%	25%	75	302	223	60	0"	1366 768	SAMSUNG

History: Score 63: 7R 7G 7B | Score 55: 6R 6G 7B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	120x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	68x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	61x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	25x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	20x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	10x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	7x
99U5471-012.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,349 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $554

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16