Alienware Area-51 R7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive331% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAlienware Area-51 R7  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 05J3W0
Memory56.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181204
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 06 '21 at 11:26
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$798
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 64.8
1-Core 128
2-Core 252
79% 148 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 993
89% 749 Pts
64-Core 2,486
154% 2,486 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.41
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 301
Reflection 200
Parallax 250
245% 250 fps
Gravity 191
Splatting 150
148% 171 fps
Poor: 128% Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
582GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1942 1650 1658 1653 1663 1657 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
331% Outstanding
Read 2,534
Write 2,357
Mixed 1,784
SusWrite 1704
470% 2,094 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 84.2
277% 96.2 MB/s
DQ Read 961
DQ Write 792
DQ Mixed 863
650% 872 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 331%
Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
124GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 341 342 342 341 342 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 465
Mixed 443
SusWrite 341
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 46.2
151% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 363
274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 104%
Great: 133%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46
280GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 333 334 334 334 334 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 441
Mixed 424
SusWrite 334
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 43.2
140% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 295
239% 338 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 125%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
931GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 349 350 350 349 349 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 389
Write 324
Mixed 347
SusWrite 349
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 75.3
244% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 422
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 610
397% 463 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 131%
Great: 372%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 171 169 171 171 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 172
Mixed 89
SusWrite 170
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
214% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
143% Outstanding
MC Read 57.2
MC Write 58.4
MC Mixed 54.8
162% 56.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 25.1
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 143%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 34.1" 1280 720 DELA1A6 DELL P3421W
Typical Area-51 R7 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO

System: Alienware Area-51 R7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,205
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback