Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9

Performance Results


Gaming 88% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	90.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 (all builds)
Memory	21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181106
Uptime	4.7 Days
Run Date	Aug 15 '21 at 16:59
Run Duration	286 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7940X-$815 4,560 User benchmarks, average bench 83% , 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Memory 71.3 1-Core 136 2-Core 267 85% 158 Pts	4-Core 513 8-Core 884 85% 698 Pts	64-Core 2,288 142% 2,288 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% MSI(1462 3901) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	106% Outstanding	Lighting 121 Reflection 180 Parallax 192 98% 164 fps	MRender 194 Gravity 147 Splatting 131 125% 157 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 2TB 2,668 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT24B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 375 390 397 406 398 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Read 471 Write 411 Mixed 376 SusWrite 388 93% 412 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 51.8 4K Mixed 35.9 119% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 332 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 177 146% 214 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 133%
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54 11,103 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 794GB free Firmware: M6CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 278 5.7 6.1 5.8 6.4 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	68.4% Good	Read 472 Write 374 Mixed 372 SusWrite 110 74% 332 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 51.2 4K Mixed 23.9 97% 33.8 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 42.5 103% 214 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 91%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$175 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 5TB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 167 171 173 173 171 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$175 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 5.5TB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 168 172 176 180 176 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 64 62 62 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 72.5 Write 50.9 Mixed 57.1 SusWrite 62.4 45% 60.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 87%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$71 8,426 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 252GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 61 63 61 61 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Read 65.6 Write 67.3 Mixed 51.5 SusWrite 62 46% 61.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 100%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 110 112 112 114 112 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 98.6 Write 97.3 Mixed 58.6 SusWrite 110 67% 91.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 87%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 78 78 79 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 134 Write 88.6 Mixed 68.3 SusWrite 79 68% 92.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 88%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 2TB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 108 108 109 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 127 Write 40.2 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 108 100% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 132% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 51%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 566GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 107 108 110 111 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Read 127 Write 120 Mixed 31.8 SusWrite 108 125% 96.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 89% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 4x8GB 3,576 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53% Above average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 24.8 MC Mixed 16.6 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 11 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 98.4 41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	27.2"	1280 720	GSM7707 LG HDR 4K

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 110%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 - $500

CPU
Core i9-7900XIntel $455Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	67x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	58x
Core i9-7920XIntel $250Bench 82%, 5,430 samples	19x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	63x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	32x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	18x

SSD
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	21x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $249Bench 279%, 18,356 samples	14x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	10x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	60x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	27x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $1,579

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16