Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	79.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210713
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Aug 15 '21 at 21:57
Run Duration	272 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$185 128,080 User benchmarks, average bench 98% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 82.7 1-Core 165 2-Core 330 102% 193 Pts	4-Core 645 8-Core 1,096 106% 870 Pts	64-Core 1,581 98% 1,581 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 112%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.07 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.8% Very good	Lighting 98.2 Reflection 110 Parallax 99.2 80% 103 fps	MRender 95.3 Gravity 97.1 Splatting 97.9 79% 96.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDS200T1X0E-00AFY0 2TB 13,468 User benchmarks, average bench 437% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: 613200WD Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,062 Write 3,736 Mixed 2,951 729% 3,250 MB/s	4K Read 70.1 4K Write 184 4K Mixed 90.5 319% 115 MB/s	DQ Read 1,287 DQ Write 1,021 DQ Mixed 1,141 857% 1,150 MB/s
Poor: 280% Great: 578%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 83 Write 75 Mixed 70.1 57% 76 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 83GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 73 75 76 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	44.6% Average	Read 80 Write 69.6 Mixed 52.9 SusWrite 74.8 51% 69.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 99%
Amd-raid WDC WD6003FFBX-6 6TB 552 User benchmarks, average bench 118% 1.5TB free Firmware: 83.00A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 170 169 169 170 169 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 164 Mixed 87 SusWrite 169 106% 146 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 7.5 4K Mixed 1.7 399% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 146%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 86 84 85 85 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Read 112 Write 95.6 Mixed 93.7 SusWrite 84.2 72% 96.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 67%
WD Gold 6TB (2016) -$183 2,043 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 3GB free Firmware: 01.01M02 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 97.8 Write 106 Mixed 61.9 66% 88.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 0.6 219% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 69% Great: 121%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 161GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 89 88 88 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 94.1 Write 57.4 Mixed 67.7 SusWrite 87.9 57% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 97%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 187GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 85 85 85 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 92.6 Write 57.5 Mixed 70.7 SusWrite 84.1 57% 76.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.8 172% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 2x16GB 2,803 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	81.8% Excellent	MC Read 34.8 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 31.5 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 28.5 SC Write 19.6 SC Mixed 33.3 78% 27.1 GB/s	Latency 75.6 53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	31.5"	1280 720	AUS32A1 VA32AQ

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,796 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,640x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,263x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $151Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,409x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,234x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,072x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,466x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,834x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	865x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $929

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16