Asus M5A78L-M/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M/USB3  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141202
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 21 '21 at 13:48
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4170 Quad-Core-$81
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 79.7
1-Core 66
2-Core 116
55% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 190
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
PwrHis(1787 201C) 2GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.50.02
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 28
Parallax 27.3
18% 25.7 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 20.5
18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 59 65 66 67 68 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.7% Average
Read 202
Write 188
Mixed 180
SusWrite 63.8
36% 158 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 31.6
101% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 33.8
DQ Write 60.4
DQ Mixed 42.4
34% 45.5 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 129%
OCZ VERTEX2 100GB
89GB free
Firmware: 1.37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 65 67 68 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 143
Write 74
Mixed 94.7
SusWrite 66.5
21% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 21.5
81% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 25.2
DQ Write 60.1
DQ Mixed 26.3
25% 37.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 49%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
243GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 152 158 162 167 164 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43% Average
Read 172
Write 176
Mixed 166
SusWrite 158
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 23.8
79% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23.2
DQ Write 58.3
DQ Mixed 30.6
26% 37.4 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 43%
Great: 95%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
545GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 105 111 113 111 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 89.4
Write 99
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 110
64% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 14.6
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 10.8
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 21.5" 1280 720 IVM562E PL2283H
Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,854 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $138
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback