Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '21 at 03:11
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 70.1
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 188
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 371
49% 367 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.8.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.8% Average
Lighting 58.9
Reflection 60.6
Parallax 88.5
48% 69.3 fps
MRender 60.4
Gravity 62.2
Splatting 44.6
44% 55.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison APS-XS03-240 240GB
146GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 325 342 346 314 324 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 283
Write 237
Mixed 286
SusWrite 331
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 19.2
70% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 49.1
52% 85.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
755GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 57 126 143 94 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 188
Write 183
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 104
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G24C16U4B.8FB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 30.2
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 25.6
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 61: 8R 5G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
61% 22% 86 113 14 75 21.5" 1920 1080 ACR058E Acer KG221Q
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,934 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback