Monster TULPAR T7 V19.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics40.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V19.3  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V19.3
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190716
Uptime3 Days
Run DateAug 28 '21 at 16:57
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 84.5
1-Core 39.8
2-Core 60.6
44% 61.6 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 133
16% 126 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1065) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6627
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.3% Average
Lighting 51.1
Reflection 75.5
Parallax 32.2
42% 52.9 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 60.2
Splatting 58.9
38% 43.3 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 243 244 246 244 244 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 1,464
Write 1,185
Mixed 726
SusWrite 262
202% 909 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 27.8
100% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 307
216% 276 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 117%
Great: 249%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
735GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 49 43 64 64 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 41.1
Write 79.8
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 55
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 14.5
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 16.8
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 54: 5R 7G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
54% 53% 38 235 117 144 17.3" 1920 1080 BOE07B6
History: Score 37: 4R 4G 5B | Score 54: 5R 7G 8B
Typical TULPAR T7 V19.3 Builds (Compare 192 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V19.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback