Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus EX-A320M-GAMING (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190912
Uptime	5.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 30 '21 at 02:00
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	36%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X-$150 15,293 User benchmarks, average bench 80% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Memory 73.4 1-Core 135 2-Core 243 83% 151 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 652 66% 535 Pts	64-Core 678 42% 678 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gigabyte(1458 22F0) CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.6.2 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	46.6% Average	Lighting 58.4 Reflection 56.8 Parallax 82.3 48% 65.8 fps	MRender 59.5 Gravity 63.2 Splatting 44.7 45% 55.8 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Klevv CRAS C710 M.2 NVMe SSD 256GB 1,003 User benchmarks, average bench 159% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0614B0G Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,457 Write 1,070 Mixed 931 255% 1,152 MB/s	4K Read 47 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 41.6 201% 77.7 MB/s	DQ Read 764 DQ Write 217 DQ Mixed 114 182% 365 MB/s
Poor: 89% Great: 210%
Seagate ST3500830AS 500GB-$145 6,517 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 20GB free Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 35 44 39 42 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	Read 46.7 Write 10.7 Mixed 29.6 SusWrite 38.6 23% 31.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB 24,860 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	70.3% Very good	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 28.3 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 19.5 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 24.2 59% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 93.8 43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 15: 0R 5G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
15%	23%	22	272	233	75	34"	2560 1080	LHC0035 TFG34F10W

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	165x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	156x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	95x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	93x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	91x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	60x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	54x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	34x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	32x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 52,667 samples	46x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	33x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $240

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16