Asus F1A55-M LK R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus F1A55-M LK R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120531
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 01 '21 at 17:24
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81 6,332 User benchmarks, average bench 47% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Memory 55.8 1-Core 44.6 2-Core 90 39% 63.5 Pts	4-Core 161 8-Core 152 21% 157 Pts	64-Core 156 10% 156 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% XFX(1682 3030) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.08% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.6 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 2 1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.08% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 808GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 104 123 72 84 124 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	71.6% Very good	Read 151 Write 97.5 Mixed 42.3 SusWrite 98.6 71% 97.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 107%
Seagate Expansion+ 2TB 2,745 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 20 20 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 32.6 Write 34.4 Mixed 28.4 SusWrite 19.7 21% 28.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 68%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB 7,970 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 19 20 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 31.1 Write 32.4 Mixed 30.2 SusWrite 19.2 21% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 98%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 931GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 37 37 36 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	20.4% Poor	Read 34.1 Write 30.5 Mixed 31 SusWrite 36.5 24% 33 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 66%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 463GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 122 127 127 124 126 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 122 Write 114 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 125 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	MC Read 11.3 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 9.7 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 7.4 18% 6.27 GB/s	Latency 141 28% 141 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	60	27"	1280 720	DEL4202 DELL S2721HSX

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A55-M LK R2.0 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LK R2.0

CPU
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	7x
A6-3500 APUAMD $60Bench 39%, 2,804 samples	4x
Athlon II X4 651AMDBench 50%, 1,008 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	3x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	2x
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	2x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
Series SATA SSD 240GBVBench 70%, 4,398 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 8GBCorsairBench 44%, 50 samples	4x
CL8-8-8 DDR3-1600 4GBUnknownBench 38%, 7 samples	2x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $369

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16