Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 179% UFO	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 205% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	192% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	341% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI (all builds)
Memory	88.8 GB free of 96 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200707
Uptime	18.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '21 at 18:02
Run Duration	268 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	Memory 79.1 1-Core 153 2-Core 301 95% 178 Pts	4-Core 584 8-Core 1,157 103% 870 Pts	64-Core 2,133 132% 2,133 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Gigabyte(1458 403F) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	192% Outstanding	Lighting 278 Reflection 252 Parallax 309 226% 280 fps	MRender 322 Gravity 234 Splatting 173 191% 243 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 192% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 415GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1637 1396 1375 1422 1412 1400 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	341% Outstanding	Read 2,666 Write 2,603 Mixed 1,934 SusWrite 1,440 485% 2,161 MB/s	4K Read 68 4K Write 170 4K Mixed 96.3 317% 112 MB/s	DQ Read 1,270 DQ Write 860 DQ Mixed 1,079 802% 1,070 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 341% Great: 410%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 94GB free Firmware: 505ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 131 130 132 130 128 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Read 402 Write 149 Mixed 195 SusWrite 132 48% 219 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 80.2 4K Mixed 35.9 139% 49.7 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 119 105% 158 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 73%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 90GB free Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 79 95 114 92 83 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	55% Above average	Read 504 Write 410 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 142 59% 267 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 25.6 84% 21.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 92%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 466GB free Firmware: JP2OA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 138 137 138 137 138 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Read 131 Write 128 Mixed 67.9 SusWrite 137 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 74%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 141 140 142 139 140 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Read 150 Write 154 Mixed 29.8 SusWrite 140 86% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 107%
WD My Passport 25E2 2TB 8,938 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1.5TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 96 96 95 97 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 94.5 Write 97.9 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 96.1 115% 85.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 95GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 16384, 32767, 16384, 32767 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 44.1 MC Write 39.3 MC Mixed 39.2 117% 40.9 GB/s	SC Read 27.9 SC Write 24 SC Mixed 39.3 87% 30.4 GB/s	Latency 82.2 49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	27"	1280 720	VSC7F34 VP2785 SERIES

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 2,221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 161%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 162%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI - $254

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	438x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	336x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	288x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	215x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	212x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	155x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	131x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	129x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	88x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	103x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	48x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,467

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16