Gigabyte GA-AERO 15-X9

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AERO 15-X9 (all builds)
Memory	24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190423
Uptime	9.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 29 '21 at 13:02
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	Memory 70.5 1-Core 49.2 2-Core 101 46% 73.4 Pts	4-Core 176 8-Core 310 29% 243 Pts	64-Core 381 24% 381 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Gigabyte(1458 1658) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6444 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.25% Terrible	Lighting 6.9 Reflection 30 Parallax 7.5 6% 14.8 fps	MRender 10.1 Gravity 6.9 Splatting 10.1 8% 9.03 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.25% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKKW010T8 1TB 3,058 User benchmarks, average bench 248% 363GB free (System drive) Firmware: 004C SusWrite @10s intervals: 1095 865 346 63 566 890 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	165% Outstanding	Read 1,851 Write 1,175 Mixed 555 SusWrite 637 233% 1,055 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 42.4 4K Mixed 39.9 129% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 343 231% 286 MB/s
Poor: 165% ↑ This bench: 165% Great: 302%
JetFlash Transcend 64GB 671 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 22GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 20 32 29 32 27 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 29.6 Write 23.7 Mixed 12.4 SusWrite 24.7 29% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 2.1 132% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB 20,439 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	67.3% Good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 24.5 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 14.8 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	6	60	15.5"	1280 720	AUO31EB

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AERO 15-X9 Builds (Compare 154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AERO 15-X9

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	114x
Core i9-8950HKIntelBench 74%, 14,729 samples	40x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	80x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	74x

SSD
SSDPEKKW010T8 1TBIntelBench 248%, 3,058 samples	104x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	5x
GP-GSM2NE3256GNTD 256GBGigabyteBench 163%, 10,769 samples	4x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	63x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	48x
F4-2666C18-16GRS Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 32GBUnknownBench 73%, 13 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16