Monster TULPAR T7 V5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 54% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V5  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V5
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150722
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 08 '21 at 18:52
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 70%
CPU Throttled 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 76.9
1-Core 51.8
2-Core 95.1
48% 74.6 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 298
29% 237 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M
Clevo(1558 7700) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.8% Poor
Lighting 34.3
Reflection 38.5
Parallax 36.9
28% 36.6 fps
MRender 35.2
Gravity 35.5
Splatting 30.7
27% 33.8 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 162 145 113 111 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 425
Write 395
Mixed 342
SusWrite 159
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 31.3
102% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 338
244% 318 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 122%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
146GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 93 94 101 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 89.6
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 97.4
54% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54%
Great: 75%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
93GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 83 84 83 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 118
Write 125
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 82.8
63% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 18.6
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 12.1
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 23: 4R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
23% 7% 72 59 5 60 17.3" 1920 1080 CMO1720
History: Score 19: 2R 2G 3B | Score 23: 4R 1G 0B
Typical TULPAR T7 V5 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $348
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback